Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Circulation Conference: American Heart Association's ; 146(Supplement 1), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2194337

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Mortality for patients on VV-ECMO remains high despite increased use during the COVID-19 pandemic. Unlike VA-ECMO which provides life support for cardiac failure and can be used as a bridge to definitive therapy during cardiac arrest (e-CPR), patients who arrest while on VV-ECMO currently may undergo traditional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This poses many challenges such as potential cannula position disruption of the VV-ECMO system during compressions and it is unclear if patients on VV-ECMO will benefit from being offered traditional CPR. Hypothesis: Traditional CPR is effective in patients who arrest while on VV-ECMO. Method(s): A retrospective chart review of inpatient cardiac arrest data from a high-volume ECMO center was performed. Patients who arrested while on VV-ECMO were included. Data including demographics, etiology of arrest, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival to discharge were reviewed. Survival data was compared with the ECLS International Summary of Statistics. Result(s): We identified 19 patients on VV-ECMO who underwent CPR for cardiac arrest between September 2012 and November 2021. The average age of the patients was 42.7 years and 89.5% (n=17) were men. Seven of the nineteen total patients (36.8%) were being treated for ARDS from COVID-19 pneumonia. The arrest occurred on average 35.6 days into hospitalization (range: 1-132 days). The initial rhythm was pulseless electrical activity in 13 patients (68.4%), and the etiologies of arrest included hypoxemia (n=10, 52.6%), ECMO machine failure or during oxygenator exchange (n=3, 15.8%), pneumothorax (n=2, 10.5%), and cardiac tamponade (n=1, 5.3%). ROSC occurred in all 19 patients (100%), however only 4 patients (21.1%) survived to discharge with good neurologic recovery. Survival to discharge for all-comers on VV-ECMO is 66%. Conclusion(s): While there is limited evidence for the effectiveness of traditional CPR for patients on VV-ECMO, in this sample, ROSC was universal and one-fifth of patients survived to discharge. Future studies should continue to study the utility of CPR on VV-ECMO and how to optimize technique to improve outcomes for these critically-ill patients.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL